Close

Reviewing the Author-function in the Age of Wikipedia

Link

http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.5653382.0001.001

Excerpt

“Wikis invoke a multitude of the theoretical issues regarding authorship raised in late structuralist and poststructuralist thought. For many in the humanities and social sciences, the decentering of authorship in favor of discursive and systemic methodologies more attuned to power, historicity, and a dynamic “field” of representation has led to novel methods for critical interpretation and evaluation. However, such models have not become a significant component in how communication is understood within the public sphere. The singular author is very much the model that governs the expectations of most readers. By complicating traditional notions of authorship, wikis affect associated issues of authority, originality, and value.”

One Laptop per Digital Divide?

Published Version

graeff-2008-onelaptop

Excerpt

“When I first heard about the One Laptop per Child [OLPC] programme—the goal of distributing inexpensively produced laptops to every child in the world for education—my immediate reaction was: what a great idea! When faced with OLPC’s cute, little XO laptops, the problem of ‘The Digital Divide’ seems so simple and so solvable

“But that was my first alarm bell: simple. It seemed so simple. Solutions can often be simple—but development problems are rarely simple. They are usually historical, culturally specific and inherently complex. And while the XO laptop may have an expertly-designed-to-be-simple interace, it is anything but a simple solution.”

A Re-imagining of Odysseus’ Odyssey in Four and One Half Acts

Script

graeff-2007-faustintermezzo

Writer-Director’s Note

Situated at the end of the “Walpurgisnacht” scene, Goethe’s original design for the “Walpurgisnacht Intermezzo” is a light-hearted play within a play that offers a polar contrast with the tragic conclusion of Faust, to which it segues. Goethe draws inspiration for this piece from the marriage of Oberon and Titania, the Faerie King and Queen, who toy with the human characters in Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Building upon the surreal dreamscape found in Shakespeare’s play, Goethe assembles a cast of ‘amateur players’ from the perverse rabble present at the pagan orgy of Walpurgisnacht. The plot is, essentially, a string of faeries and human archetypes acquainting themselves to the wedding scene and to the audience with abstruse proclamations made in overwrought verse.

In preparing a contemporary substitution for Goethe’s “Intermezzo,” my goals were to transfer the elevated speech patterns and general self-importance to a more accessible plotline, and to uphold the author’s deft satire of this cast of amateur players performing their art. I selected the Odyssey for three reasons: 1) most everyone has heard of the Odyssey or Odysseus, and has vague idea that he fights a one-eyed giant somewhere along the way; 2) outside of the literary circles of Greek scholars, the characters of the Odyssey can be easily simplified to either ‘the epic hero’ or ‘not the epic hero,’ providing me the opportunity to develop perfectly arbitrary personalities that the amateur players deem as authentic; and 3) in his superhuman and chivalrous return to wife Penelope, Odysseus exemplifies not only an epic hero but a Romantic ideal as well.

Using cues from Goethe, both textual and biographical, the idealism of the Romanticists is as ripe for lampooning as the rationalism of the Enlightenment’s Humanists. The competitive co-existence of these two perspectives constitutes one of Faust’s central struggles. In the Walpurgisnacht scene, the presence of this duality takes a frenetic turn, as the abundance of hedonistic appeals simultaneously delights and disgusts. By way of satirizing the serious performance of a serious play, Goethe and I attempt to encapsulate the effortless hypocrisy of the self-possessed amateurs.

Hoping to make all this come together, I wrote and directed “A Re-imagining of Odysseus’ Odyssey in Four and One Half Acts” to visually play with the definitions of Romantic versus romantic (ro-man-tique), and to offer another outlet for Goethe’s allegorical blurring of sin by way of intellectual hubris and sin by way of hedonism.

In summary, this playlet is dedicated to the actors, playwrights, and directors (fictional or otherwise) who sometimes take themselves too seriously. And of course, I want to especially thank our own Oberkünstler Peter Ferran for asking me to work on this.

Wikis, Authority and the Public Sphere

Panel Abstract

As social computing practices continue to modify and transform how cultural texts can be generated and circulated, written communities fostered and sustained by wikis offer some insight into the possibilities and pitfalls of dynamic, group authored content production. The fame (and infamy) of Wikipedia as an example of on-line wiki-activity begins to address some of the theoretical issues about authorship raised in late structuralist and poststructuralist thought. For many in the humanities and social sciences, the de-centering of authorship in favor of discursive and systemic modes more attuned to power and historicity across the field of representation has led to novel methods for critical interpretation and evaluation. As such, this panel will consider the avenues by which wiki activity and related social computing phenomena further complicate traditional notions of authorship and, thus, associated issues of authority, originality and value.

Wikis are software programs that allow users to create and edit web pages with a web browser. The implications of open access on the creation and editing of content is profound. In an unprecedented way, wikis allow for discourse to emerge that is continually negotiated and articulated through a community of users; sometimes, literally, thousands of interlocutors. The properties of texts that have emerged from active collaboration test the boundaries of established avenues of knowledge production and modern institutions of knowledge and authority. The recent controversies surrounding Wikipedia speak to the sense of encroachment felt by many established media and information outlets.

This panel seeks papers that analyze and assess prominent examples of wiki collaboration from various theoretical perspectives. We seek papers that address how wikis function in the context of established media and the public sphere. As wikis present the attendant risks associated with any social forum (misrepresentation, hate-speech, hoaxes, vandalism, and the like), how do wiki communities debate, shape and regulate the mores, practices, even the terminology, of public discourse?