Close

Technology and the Virtues book review

Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth WantingTechnology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting by Shannon Vallor
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Shannon Vallor’s Technology and the Virtues is the best book on technology ethics. It is not a practical guide to ethical decision-making in technology. It won’t tell you what to do given a specific dilemma. Instead, it’s much deeper—a careful philosophical argument for a global framework for virtue ethics that meaningfully engages with the entwinement of contemporary technology and civilization. If you want a learn how to work toward human flourishing in the age of AI, gene editing, etc., this will tell you what capacities to work on and how they can help you ask better questions and work with others to build good sociotechnical futures.

The first part of the book makes the argument for a shared set of ethical ideas across virtue traditions in Buddhism, Confucianism, and Western (Aristotelian) philosophy. This allows Vallor to argue that we can conceive a global ethical framework to address technologies that are global in scope. These are densest academic chapters of the book. But they establish some important concepts like “moral attention,” which help us understand how the “technomoral” virtues, eventually defined in Chapter 6, work.

Building on the classical virtue traditions, Vallor identifies 12 virtues for the 21st century: Honesty, Self-Control, Humility, Justice, Courage, Empathy, Care, Civility, Flexibility, Perspective, Magnanimity, and Technomoral Wisdom. Some of these are familiar virtues with definitions updated for the times. Others are new, like Care, which embraces feminist care ethics. And some do not mean what their common word definitions would indicate. For instance, the technomoral virtue of Civility is a “more robust form of cosmopolitan civic-mindedness, a reliably and intelligently expressed disposition to value communal ethical life in a global technosocial context and to act accordingly.”

The last section of the book examines four technological domains—social media, surveillance, robots, and human enhancement technology—and how we should use the technomoral virtues to navigate their ethical complexities and find paths toward designing, using, and regulating the technologies to achieve global human flourishing. Although the book came out in 2016, Vallor’s examinations of social media and artificial intelligence are still relevant and compelling. She concludes the book by discussing human enhancement technologies like gene editing because it forces us to literally ask: What is human flourishing? What is precious about humanity? What defines human dignity? She calls this “Knowing what to wish for” and argues that these fundamental questions require our collective technomoral Wisdom—the supreme virtue of applying our various cultivated virtues to good ends.

In my own research and pedagogy on ethical responsibilities of engineers and technologists, I have concluded that some version of cultivated virtue is necessary to ensure we have folks building our technologies with eyes wide open, appropriate humility, and a civic-mindedness that transcends narrow perspectives and economic assumptions. If you care about this, you should read this book. If you are interested in what it takes to be virtuous in the 21st century, you should read this book. Highly recommended!

View all my reviews

How Infrastructure Works book review

How Infrastructure Works: Inside the Systems That Shape Our WorldHow Infrastructure Works: Inside the Systems That Shape Our World by Deb Chachra
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

This is a beautiful crossover science and technology studies (STS) book. It speaks to scholars by offering several novel descriptions and frameworks of infrastructure as sociotechnical systems and introduces the concept of “infrastructural citizenship” at the end. For public interest readers, those academic ideas are made accessible thanks to accessible stories covering the history and context of specific examples of “charismatic megastructures” and the ways they touch us personally. The author Deb Chachra makes infrastructure helpfully human-scale by presenting her own connections to infrastructure in autobiographical vignettes. Her visit to the Dinorwig Power Station in Wales is a standout example. If you are a fan of the podcast 99% Invisible, as I am, you can imagine such stories as excellent episodes.

There are two ideas in the book that changed how I see the world. The first is that “energy is the currency of the material world” (p. 40), and we have an opportunity with renewable energy sources to think not in terms of scarce energy but abundant energy, and address the fact that the material we have to work with is finite (Earth is essentially a closed system of matter). People need energy to survive: food, heating/cooling, mobility, etc. Infrastructure systems generate and deliver energy and also mediate the ways energy and power can be accessed and used. Humanity’s energy consumption has been growing tremendously in recent decades. Our production of energy has relied on finite materials, primarily fossil fuels, and we have produced pollution that corrupts other material resources. We must be stewards of those finite resources, and we have that opportunity if we harness the full potential of renewable energy, which is dramatically more than conceivable consumption when you account for all sunlight hitting the Earth’s surface.

My other favorite idea comes from the metaphor of the “Black Start” (pp. 200–201), which is an emergency system for generating power and getting things online when there is a blackout of all the conventional power generation systems. Chachra argues that fossil fuels, like coal and crude oil, were humanity’s “black start”—”a transition phase.” They enabled our rapid advances in technology and society, “[lifting] us out of darkness, literally and metaphorically, giving us the time and resources to create our global, connected, highly cooperative, technological civilization.” And now that we are at this point, able to invent renewable energy technologies, it’s our duty to transcend “the pollution and inefficiency of our black start.”

The book’s title is punchy, but it would be more accurate if it read How Infrastructure Should Work. Chachra is really making a normative argument through her chapters. Rather than being overly concerned with how infrastructure works technically, she is really trying to describe the social, political, historical, and economic contexts that produce certain infrastructure and also mediate how it works and what it can do. The book is also future-oriented, taking stock of our current infrastructure, whether it serves us well or not, and imagining the future we should be building together. In Chapter 10, “Rethinking the Ultrastructure,” Chachra enumerates 6 actionable principles for new infrastructure that distill several of the key insights of the book:

1. Plan for Abundant Energy and Finite Materials
2. Design for Resilience
3. Build for Flexibility
4. Move Toward an Ethics of Care
5. Recognize, Prioritize, and Defend Nonmonetary Benefits
6. Make It Public

The concluding chapter on “Infrastructural Citizenship” is particularly exciting to me as a scholar of citizenship and civic engagement. Chachra defines it as the “idea of being in an ongoing relationship with others simply by virtue of having bodies that exist in the world and which share common needs […] it carries with it the responsibility to sustainably steward common-pool resources, including the environment itself, so that future communities can support themselves and each other so they all can thrive” (p. 276). This form of citizenship is well aligned with my own writing on civic professionalism in engineering, but it dramatically expands the scope of accounting for the public interest: thinking locally and globally simultaneously and imagining our distant descendants and the Earth we want to leave for others.

Confession: I’m biased. Deb Chachra is a colleague of mine on the faculty of Olin College of Engineering and longtime friend. I observed her develop some of these ideas in earlier writing and a course she taught on Infrastructure Studies for first year students. And I believe the book is truly great. I am impressed by how accessible she makes her ideas and see the value of the work as a scholar.

I unabashedly recommend this book!

View all my reviews

The Digital Good demands Civic-minded Technologists

Citation

Graeff, E. 2024. “The Digital Good demands Civic-minded Technologists.” Presented at EASST-4S 2024: Making & Doing Transformations, Amsterdam, Netherlands, NY, Jul 17.

Presentation

Abstract

Engineering’s “culture of disengagement” (Cech 2014) casts a long shadow on society. The anemic civic philosophy, preached by lauded tech heroes, pretends politics and power don’t apply to technology, that we can reduce most problems to technical challenges, and that meritocracy is justice. There are bright spots—individual, civic-minded technologists; the Tech Workers Coalition; and the Integrity Institute, a community of practice for “trust and integrity” professionals from technology companies. But it’s insufficient. To solve the challenges of contemporary society and democracy, entwined with sociotechnical systems, we need to understand technology’s civic landscape and reframe the technical expert’s role in democracy. 

Engineering has a rich history of political activism and rumination about its social and civic responsibility (Layton 1986; Wisniowski 2016). And STS has long tried to understand and define ethical technology. However, computing has grown more deprofessionalized over time, loosening its ethical tethers. Simultaneously, there are growing concerns about the role technologists play in society. So how should civic-mindedness intersect with the education and daily practice of technologists?

I’ve conducted 17 interviews with leading engineering educators, looked at the history of civic engagement and civic-mindedness in engineering and computing, and worked on defining civic professionalism in technology. My research supports an argument that technologists need a political education. Unfortunately, civic learning is scarce in most undergraduate programs and even secondary schools, and it’s particularly uncommon in computing. So we must define and invest in civic learning and a civic culture in computing, because the digital good really demands civic-minded technologists.